Eh! José!

News, views, and gossip from Montreal, Canada, and the world

Archive for November, 2008

Federal election..part deux???

Posted by Jose Alvarez on November 28, 2008

It seems it was only last month that Canadians went to the polls to elect the same federal government we had before. Oh wait..it WAS only last month! Now brace yourselves, sharpen your pencils, have your photo ID at hand, and remove your veils my fellow Canadians because this is no joke, we might be heading towards yet another federal election.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced his much anticipated economic update this afternoon, and the three opposition parties didn’t like it one bit.

Among other things, Flaherty’s plan includes cutting the $30-million public subsidy granted to political parties on a per vote basis and limiting public-sector salariesincreases to 1.5 per cent. But what pleased opposition parties the least was in fact something that’s missing in Flaherty’s update: a stimulus package.

So the Liberals, the NDP, and the Bloc have made up their mind: there is no way they will vote for this plan. And this being a confidence vote, we’re facing and imminate dissolution of parliament.

But wait, it turns out we might be spared the agony of all those campaign rallies and debates since there are some rumours of a coalition government between the opposition parties. For now these are just rumours but the possiblity is there and if you ask me, it’s a pretty good idea.

Although the idea of a coalition government might seem a bit abstract for us, it’s a formula that has been used quite frequently in Europe. The opposition parties understand that Canadians don’t want another election, and a coalition government seems like the best option if they are not willing to support the Conservative’s economic plan.

Let’s hope Dion, Layton, and Duceppe can come to an agreement in order to form a new government without sending us back to the polls.

CBC report on Flaherty\’s economic update

Posted in Canada, Opinion | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Divided they stand

Posted by Jose Alvarez on November 27, 2008

November 4 was a night of contradictions in the United States. That night, while Americans made history as they elected their first African-American president, millions of people in California were stripped of their right to marry simply because they are gay.

And while Americans from many different ethnic backgrounds, religions, and sexual orientations came together to elect Barack Obama and enter an era of change, they stood divided on whether to allow two people of the same sex to get married or not.

Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment meant to define marriage as strictly between a man and a woman, was approved by 52 per cent of Californians. On the days that followed, members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community organized mass protests, showing their discontent towards two main groups: the Mormons and African-Americans.

It was in fact the Mormon Church that was behind Proposition 8. Its members contributed to the yes on Prop 8 campaign with more that $20 million. The church ran a campaign in which they made gay marriage a religious issue, and not a civil rights one. It was the Mormons’ effectiveness in convincing people that this was a religious matter that won them most of the African-American vote.

Seventy per cent of African-American voters supported Proposition 8, and for many gays and lesbians, this is a reflection of the widespread homophobia among blacks. But blaming African-Americans also brought up the inherent racism among some homosexuals.

“Three older men accosted my friend and shouted, ‘Black people did this, I hope you are happy!’” wrote A. Ronald on Rod 2.0, a blog targeted at gay African-Americans. Ronald wasn’t the only blogger that reported such attacks, and the irony is that most of those African-Americans verbally abused by gay men and women at anti-Prop 8 rallies were gay too.

The passage of Proposition 8 is indeed a sad episode in a time where people seem so eager about political and social change. Not only does banning same-sex marriage constitute an enormous step backwards in terms of equality, but it has also brought to the surface once again the division between the different minority groups in the United States.

What this demonstrates is not that a majority of African-Americans are homophobic or that many white homosexuals are racist, but that an issue like gay marriage can still profoundly divide people.
Not everything is lost in the battle for equality, but minorities should work together if they want real change to happen. Pointing fingers at each other and blaming the “others” for their failures will only perpetuate the unhealthy tension that exists now between them.

Fortunately, people from different minority groups are starting to realize that they need to seal this wound. In a letter addressed to the LGTB community, the members of the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center say that blaming other minority groups for the passage of Proposition 8 “only serves to divide [their] community and hinder [their] ability to create a stronger and more diverse coalition to help [them] overturn Proposition 8 and restore full equality and human rights to LGBT people,” and that “there are many allied communities—straight, African-American, Asian Pacific Islander, Latino, Native American, white, people of faith, and secular people—who are energized to join with [them] as never before.”

African-American journalist Raymond Leon Roker also wrote in The Huffington Post about the importance of working together. “In the coming weeks, those of us who are standing against Proposition 8 — including, I’m sure, millions of blacks nationwide — are all going to need unity as we lobby, fight and advocate for either a reversal of this amendment or a new battle in 2010,” he said.

Gays and lesbians need to stop blaming blacks for what happened on Nov. 4. Instead, they need to reach out and form coalitions with other communities. They need to show blacks, Hispanics, and even Mormons that gay marriage is a civil rights issue that has nothing to do with religion. Most importantly, all Americans need to realize that if they really want change they need to stop living in a country of contradictions where an African-American can become president but two people who love each other can’t get married because they are of the same sex.

Posted in International, Opinion | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Dear candidates

Posted by Jose Alvarez on November 27, 2008

Dear Jean, Pauline, and Mario,

Seeing that you’re going around Quebec making promises in order to get votes, here’s a short list of things I would like (not in any particular order):

1. When I’m sick, I want to be able to see a doctor before either of these two things happens:

a) My body heals itself

b) I die

2. I want to be able to get a job so I can pay for my student loans once I finish school in a few months.

3. I want that woman I saw on the bus with three babies and a huge baby carriage to be able to send all her kids to daycare so she can work..or relax…or make more babies.

4. I want to afford getting on the bus!

5. I want you to stop ignoring Anglophones

6. I want Bill 101 gone (ok that was wishful thinking but hey, it’s the holiday season)

7. I want to be able to see all those packs of cigarettes at the depanneur even if I don’t smoke, because in case you didn’t realize it, we still know they are there!

8. If immigrants are forced to learn French, I want Quebecers to be forced to learn about immigrants.

I think that’s it. I wanted to add yellow margarine to the list but I just remembered we got that last July.

Posted in Opinion, Quebec | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Shamie on you

Posted by Jose Alvarez on November 22, 2008

On November 2004 Gemma Raeburn and two of her friends were cleaning up her garage when six police officers arrived at the scene and drew their guns at them. Their crime? Being black.

Because when you see three black people taking stuff out from a Dollard-des-Ormeaux garage it’s gotta be a break-in right? Well, it turns out the six white cops were wrong and when Raeburn told them that it wouldn’t had happened if she and her friends were white, two of the cops replied with comments such as “bullets don’t see colour” and “why don’t you go back to your own country?”

Completely racist? A Quebec Court judge doesn’t think so. Last month he reversed a 2007 decision by the police ethics committee that gave a one-day and three-day suspension to constables Roger Carbonneau and Isabelle Nault respectively. Judge Mark Shamie seems to think that although the remarks were unfortunate, they weren’t discriminatory.

You’re wrong Judge Shamie. “Why don’t you go back to your own country” is one of the most discriminatory remarks a person can make. By making that comment, these two cops were telling Raeburn and her friends that they were different, that this isn’t really their country because they’re not white and that if they don’t like the way they’re treated they should go back to whatever country they came from.

Judge Shamie’s ruling sends people the wrong message. It says that it’s not a big deal for police officers and other public officials to make discriminatory remarks. And if the police can get away with it, why can’t everyone else?

What Judge Shamie did is nothing else but to condone discrimination. Shouldn’t it be the other way around? Shouldn’t judges, the police, politicians, and everyone else in society for that matter fight against discrimination in this country?

People from all over the world come to Canada because they believe they will have a better life here. And yet many of them have to face constant discrimination because of their skin colour, their religion, the way they dress or the way they talk. This is their country as much as it is everyone else’s.

This is our country no matter our colour or the language we speak.

This is our country no matter if we were born here nor not, if we’re children of immigrants or if our family got here 400 years ago.

No one has the right to tell us to go back to our country because we are already there.

Judge Shamie’s ruling is a setback in the fight against discrimination in this country of ours. What a shame.

Posted in Montreal, Opinion, Quebec | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Marketing 101

Posted by Jose Alvarez on November 22, 2008

Everything’s bigger in America; their burgers, their malls, their movie stars and, of course, their election day. Tuesday was a historical day for our southern neighbours. Not only did they elect the first African-American president in the history of their country, but they also had the highest voter turnout since 1908.

Sixty-four per cent of eligible voters showed up at the polls on Nov. 4, the equivalent of almost 137 million Americans. Meanwhile, three weeks ago only 59 per cent of eligible Canadian voters cast their vote in our federal election, marking a record-low voter turnout in Canadian history.

So why is it that while south of the border people voted in record numbers, we preferred to stay home and let someone else decide for us? It’s simple: Americans are good at marketing their products.

Like hamburgers and blue jeans, democracy is a product that needs proper marketing in order to work, and Americans understood that very well. It takes more than hanging posters from street signs and a lot of handshaking to get people excited about an election. While the Canadian campaign consisted of two debates, a few ads, and a lot of repetitive speeches, John McCain and Barack Obama attended popular talk-shows from The View to Saturday Night Live, bought prime-time television slots, and even had the support of stars like Oprah and Elisabeth Hasselbeck.

Both sides knew exactly who their target audience was, and they did everything they could to market their product. Only in America would a plumber become an overnight celebrity just because the candidates decided to make him a symbol of the average hard-working middle-class person. If Stephane Dion had found his personal Joe the plumber for instance, maybe he would have made a better job at selling his precious green plan.

There was a very important factor in last Tuesday’s record turnout: the youth vote was stronger than ever. Good marketers as they are, Americans did everything they could to get young people to vote. Many Hollywood stars participated in a campaign designed to attract young voters, and the candidates used innovative ways such as Facebook in order to get their message across. And it worked. As much as 54 per cent of eligible voters aged 18 to 29 cast their ballot on Nov. 4, a 19 per cent increase from 2004. In Canada young voters seemed to be more interested in what was going on south of the border than in voting for their prime minister.

It’s not a good sign when Canadians start getting more interested in American politics than in who we send to Ottawa. Maybe it’s time that we learn a thing or two from the Americans and start thinking about new ways to make our elections more appealing, particularly to young voters. After all, when a product isn’t selling well, there must be a change in the marketing strategy.

Posted in Canada, International, Opinion | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Lunch for two

Posted by Jose Alvarez on November 22, 2008

Have you ever had one of those random conversations with a stranger while waiting for the bus or standing at the checkout line at the grocery store? I have, and to be honest, I don’t like them very much. They’re just awkward and I never really know what to say, so I’ll do anything to avoid having to listen to that old lady behind me. Because they’re almost always old ladies.

So you can imagine that when an elderly woman asked me to sit down with her during lunch a few weeks ago, I wasn’t very thrilled. But seeing that there weren’t any other seats available, I thanked her and sat down at her table.

I learned quite a few things during my lunch with Thérèse. She’s retired, she worked as a waitress her whole life, she lives alone in a small but comfy apartment, she enjoys having her coffee at McDonald’s everyday, and she likes watching reality TV shows where participants get paired up in the hope that they’ll find their other half.

“They should do one of those shows for people my age,” she told me.

But the most important thing I learned was the reason why old ladies tend to have conversations with random people like me: they are just lonely.

Like Thérèse, there are more than four million Canadians over the age of 65, and with baby boomers soon to hit the 65-year-old mark, that number will double by 2026.
Although some Canadian seniors try to keep themselves busy by joining volunteer groups or organizations, there is no doubt that many of them live a pretty lonely life. Take Thérèse for example, who spends most of her day watching TV and only dares to go out as far as her local McDonald’s for fear that something will happen to her while she walks alone on the street, or the elderly man in my neighbourhood whose hobby consists of taking the bus back and forth all day long.

Should it then come as a surprise that the percentage of seniors aged 65 to 74 using the Internet more than doubled between 2000 and 2003? Twenty-eight per cent of them are now Internet users, and those aged 75 and up are also catching up on their mouse use. Perhaps the Internet helps them feel a little more connected to the world that seems to have forgotten them.

Maybe if we weren’t so focused on our own lives we would realize that there’s people like Thérèse out there that need some of our time and care. Why is it that we think it’s ok to simply abandon our parents at a retirement home or a small apartment? Are we too busy to take care of them like they took care of us when we were kids?

Granted some seniors still like their privacy and will insist on living on their own while they are still capable of doing so, but that is no excuse for not visiting them, taking them out for lunch, or simply calling them so they have someone to talk to.

Being lonely and having nothing to do aren’t exactly the greatest things in life, and senior citizens could use some of our company. So what can we do? You might have parents or grandparents you might consider seeing more often, or you might want to start volunteering at a retirement home. But most importantly, when the old lady waiting in line behind you starts talking, listen to her. I know next time I will.

Posted in Canada, Montreal, Opinion, Quebec | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »